Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Michael: On The Logic of Suicide Bomb Terrorism

A new study of suicide terrorism by political scientist Robert Pape of University of Chicago, examining every known incident since 1980, has thrown clear light on a murky and emotional issue. The study suggests that contrary to popular sentiment, which casts suicide bombers as unstable religious fanatics who despise Western culture or religion, suicide terror attacks actually have in common a highly specific political aim: to force a modern democratic state to end a foreign occupation. Almost half the time, suicide bombing campaigns have succeeded in achieving at least some of their political goals. When the terrorists’ political goal is achieved, the attacks have stopped immediately. This study indicates that suicide attacks are used for one imperative reason: they often work to force a political accommodation despite great asymmetries of power.

Look to 9/11 as an example. 9/11 was essentially a very innovative suicide bombing attack. Bin Laden cited many reasons for the attack, but the central rationale was the stationing of some 10,000 American troops in Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden was able to galvanize the mainly Saudi attackers using religious sentiments because many Saudi saw our troops as foreign occupiers of their homeland, and of the Islamic holy land. And the attacks of 9/11 worked. Following 9/11 the Bush Administration removed nearly all American troops from Saudi Arabia. Satisfying al Qaida’s demands may not have been Bush’s primary purpose, but I doubt bin Laden cares – from al Qaida’s perspective he won a major political concession, even if it was presented by America in terms of a changing strategic picture upon the fall of the Ba’ath regime in Iraq. 9/11 also fixed in the mind of every Middle Easterner the idea that America would capitulate, and even act contrary to its strategic interests, if pushed with suicide bombing attacks on American soil.

Now, America has almost 140,000 unwelcome troops occupying Iraq. History and logic suggest this situation will provoke more suicide bombing attacks on America in an attempt to dislodge us. For now, such attacks are confined to targets of opportunity in Iraq, but that isn’t likely to last. Why haven’t we been hit with terrorist attacks at home yet? Intercepts suggest bin Laden ordered that attacks should concentrate on Coalition ‘partners’ to isolate America politically. Terrorist attacks are way up all around the world since the occupation of Iraq, but those which have registered most strongly with American media are the attack on Spain, prompting their withdrawal from Iraq, and now the attack on England, which will test British resolve to remain in Iraq. England’s soul searching will be especially intense now that it seems clear that the London suicide bombers were British born, not foreigners. It is inevitable that American civilians will once again become targets of terrorism unless and until our troops leave Iraq.

One can infer from Pape’s study simple rules to avoid and prevent suicide bombing attacks; don’t occupy foreign countries or territories, especially those having differing cultural or religious traditions, and if you are already doing so, stop. Americans are eventually going to have to ask themselves if the pieties and empty rhetoric the Bush Administration has cobbled together in lieu of a real causus belli are worth, not just the lives of our troops in Iraq, but also the lives of untold numbers of additional innocent Americans civilians who will certainly become terrorist casualties if we stay in Iraq? You’ve been conditioned to think, “Isn’t that capitulating to terrorists again?” But it is discretion and wisdom, not capitulation or cowardice, if the coming crop of Iraq-inspired suicide bombers primary reason to strike us is removed before they ever do so.


At 10:29 AM, Blogger MommyCool said...

It's a never ending circle, isn't it. As long as one can truly believe they can kill themselves for the glory of their God, this sickening and illogical cycle will continue. Nothing is productive when you kill the innocent, especially Iraqi children who don't understand this world they were brought into. asks, "If there were piles of shiny, golden coins worth millions and billions of dollars, would a suicide bomber stop his mission on the street to gaze at the potential of the loot?" These Iraqi kids were gold.

At 10:31 PM, Blogger shrimplate said...

I am unsure if mommycool is referring to Iraqi kids who may someday choose to become suicide bombers or the Iraqi kids who get their arms blown off by U.S. ordinance and then grace the covers of American magazines.

If there were piles of shiny gold coins worth billions lying around somewhere, American soldiers would be dying in order that Halliburton get those filthy riches.

At 1:16 AM, Blogger Jack Benway said...

The brainwashing of suicide bombers goes back to Hassan I-Sabbah and the Society of Assassins during the crusades. The political goal that suicide bombings attempts to reach has nothing to do with the mechansim by which the bombers are recruited, no more than the GI Bill has anything to do with US foreign policy.

At 7:43 PM, Blogger Michael said...

Benway, the way that suicide bombers are recuited and indoctrinated is largely speculative, at best, but it seems likely that either no one has an incentive to brainwash bombers when there is no occupied territory disputed, or there are appeals possible to self-sacrifice that work only when a strong nationalist and/or religious goal is evident. In any case, if brainwashing were all that it took to create suicide bombers, any cult would have use of them.

In addition, I have to say I find the intimation of a neccessary tie between Islam and suicide assassins in your reference objectionable. Perhaps that was not your intent; I hope not. Suicide terrorism is neither inherent in nor consistent with Islam, any more than doctrinally inspired torture (Inquisition anyone?) is inherent in Christianity. As well, there are plenty of instances of purely secular groups, such as the Tamil Tigers, who practically invented suicide bombing, using suicide bombing as a mode of terrorism.

At 10:22 PM, Blogger Jack Benway said...

It weems pretty clear from the rhetoric of the radical Islamic factions claiming responsibility for the vast majority of the suicide bombings that the motivation for the bombings goes well beyond the expulsion of an occupying force. This is a religious war to them with the goal of the destruction of the infidel, the relatively free western way of life.

Yes, I am not only intimating, I am plainly stating that the suicide bombing technique is tied to Islam. Certainly it is not a commonly held doctrine among modern thinking Islamics, but the promise of spiritual rewards for martyrdom is tightly bound to the Islamic doctrine under which the suicide bombers operate. Just because secular groups may also use the same tactic does not refute suicide bombing as a doctrinal practice of some Islmaic factions.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

RSS/Atom Feed Site Meter
Powered by Blogger